Many people write or speak to tell us what we should think. Some want to be believed because they are experts, or think they are. Some want to be believed because they claim to speak for us. Some have had revelations. Others want us to trust them because they communicate through prominent media outlets. Many tell us what we should think. I write to encourage my readers to think for themselves. I write to ask you to inquire. Question me. Have fun.

  
Comment of the Day
Fixing GOP

Apr 04, 2013

The Republican National Committee prepared the Growth and Opportunity Project report suggesting using more digital media. The problem is with the message, not with the media. Americans in general, both Democrats and Republicans, adopted many socialistic concepts which are clearly different from the concepts of the Founding Fathers, and contrary to the free market political system that built the wealth of this nation in the first place. For Democrats this pro socialistic shift is natural, as – similarly with European social democrats – they seek policies mitigating harshness of the capitalistic system. For Republicans, formally standing for a smaller government and more liberties for individuals, adopting socialistic concepts (support for our clearly socialistic immigration law is the most obvious example) it is a split personality disorder. They do not need experts in digital media. They need Dr. Phil.

PREVIOUS COMMENTS
Divorce government from marriage
Mar 23, 2013
The gay marriage issue has nothing to do with social values, but a lot with values measured in dollars. Why do gays want the same marriage rights? Because the government created so many entitlements and tax discounts associated with family that being gay plainly means higher costs of living and more bureaucratic hassle. The question is, should we extend the current government interference into family matters to the homosexual relationships, or should we realize that we went too far and that we need to back off and eliminate all together most of the regulations and tax discounts intended to strengthen American families? On this occasion, one may notice as well that American families were strong before government took upon itself a task of helping them. After about fifty years of government help we have more than ever disintegrated American families. The best way of addressing the same sex marriage dispute is by divorcing government from the marriage issue.
More
We do not need family sponsored immigration visas
Mar 16, 2013
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina is trying to limit immigration visas available now for family members of permanent residents and U.S. citizens. In general, it is good direction. However, the question is should politicians in Washington make decisions of this kind. If an American marries a foreigner, that foreigner should have a visitor’s visa with permission to work for the duration of the marriage. No immigration visa is needed for two people being happy together. The immigration visa is needed if a foreigner wants to use our welfare system. This is exactly what we do not want. However, if a foreigner married to an American legal resident or a citizen lives and works here for a prolonged time - let us say five years - this person should automatically qualify for a green card. In this approach we do not need limits; we do not need immigration bureaucracy.
More
We need a guest worker law
Mar 04, 2013
If today we grant green cards to all illegal immigrants, surprisingly many would pack up and return home. They would do this knowing that when the economy improves, they would have the freedom to come back. Staying here is not such a value as the freedom of doing so. Formalizing the alien worker status is the key. Not all people allowed to work here will stay permanently. Returning to their countries, they will be the best ambassadors America can have. For example, allowing this free labor traffic with Latin America would result with many Latinos having seed capital to start their businesses there. Even more, it would inject into their, often corrupt, political system millions of influential people familiar with freedoms we have in the U.S., and forming grass root demands for system changes there.
More
Conservatives and liberals are much alike
Jan 24, 2013
Liberals are just socialists. Conservatism as we have it today is like a once young attractive woman, who a few decades ago pledged to be faithful to the ideas of limited government and freedoms of individuals. In the meantime, for many short-term benefits this woman went to bed with religious bigots, with nationalists, with military complex, and with whomever else came along promising political power. This woman is still attractive to some, but respected by no one. Liberals want an authoritarian government executing their ideological preferences. Conservatives want an authoritarian government executing their ideological preferences. The ideological preferences are different; the yearning for a totalitarian government is the same.
More
Terrorists won again
Jan 18, 2013
The whole world turned theireyes to the hostage drama somewhere in the middle of Sahara. Seeking recognition, a group of fringe terrorists did what terrorists usually do - took a group of foreign experts hostage. The political leaders in London, Oslo, Paris, Tokyo, and Washington got busy. The market got hectic not knowing how things would end up. Some people died and media will speculate for a few days if this was avoidable. Terrorist got what they wanted: recognition. It is just about time to realize that some parts of the world are politically unstable, and there is not much we can do about it. If you want to go there to work you best prepare get your wife that you might not come back alive. And, if some fanatic militants kill you; there is no news worth reporting.
More
Immigration crisis ever unresolved
Jan 15, 2013
Marco Rubio tries to find a middle ground between water and fire. It looks like that he is more a politician for the sake of staying in politics, than a statesman not afraid of boldly using water or fire when needed to do something important. Mr. Rubio hopes to enhance his political career by riding the immigration issue. The last several years have proved that there is no compromise between fierce nativists and proponents of more open immigration policies. Compromise is not the way to resolve our immigration mess.
More
More Comments

Instead of a resume…

It started almost by itself …
Many, many years ago, when I was twenty years old, I published my first article in the nationwide Polish student weekly magazine “Politechnik”. It was a story about a political initiative that hadn’t worked out. I deeply offended some, and was highly praised by a few. It was an augury of what was to come. In the following several years I published a few hundred texts in various Polish magazines.

Deep waters
I recognition of my writing in student magazines, in the summer of 1972 I was awarded a one month internship in „Życie i Nowoczesność”(“Life and Modernity”), a weekly section of “Życie Warszawy”, a main daily newspaper in Warsaw. At that time “Życie i Nowoczesność”, under the leadership of Stefan Bratkowski, was the most regarded political periodical in Poland. My internship evolved into continued freelance writing until the fall of 1973, when party apparatchiks had had enough and fired Bratkowski and his team.

Fifteen minutes of fame
After losing independence at the end of 18th century, Poles turned to tradition and literature to preserve the national identity. In the 19th century, the political situation in Europe did not give Poles a chance to regain independence, and uprisings were losing battles from the start. For centuries trade and banking in Poland were in Jewish hands, and Poles did not have much respect for this kind of activities, and consequently lacked the skills to be successful. This combination of circumstances created a stereotype of a Pole as someone who recites patriotic poems, fails in economic activities and fights to the last drop of blood for a lost cause. It was in this context that Adam Mickiewicz, the greatest Polish romantic poet, called the ideas of his youth “lofty and stupid”.

Thirty years after World War II, Poles had changed. For all the patriotic talk, they’d learned the value of a professional education. They became homo economicus, and in political thinking and action were more into getting small, but nevertheless real, gains, rather than losses in bravado actions for the great cause. I put it in writing, titled “Neither lofty nor stupid” (“Ani chmurni, ani durni”) and “Polityka”, the main political magazine in Poland, published it in as a cover story. This text shocked the Polish intelligentsia. Almost every columnist in the country responded. I was famous.

A prestigious award
In late seventies, besides “Polityka”, I wrote for “Przegląd Techniczny” (“Technological Review”), a political weekly magazine targeting young engineers. In 1979 I got the third prize in a competition for the best story about the start-up of an engineers career. About fifty authors participated in this competition, among them the best reporters in the country.

Transport. Problems and hopes.
In 1978 I was offered to write a popular book about the transportation system in Poland. So I did it.

The letter written too well
During the “Solidarity” period in 1980-81, I wrote many ad hoc political pieces. My open letter to a top party member was duplicated in hundreds of “Solidarity” bulletins and cost me my job after martial law was introduced.

Could it be better in Poland?
In early 1980, sensing the oncoming crisis, I started writing a book defining conflicts, discussing possible scenarios of their eruption, and looking for peaceful solutions. The manuscript was ready on the day “Solidarity” was born. My book was purchased by one of the most reputable publishing houses, “Wydawnictwo Literackie”. A few days before the manuscript was to be sent to press, martial law was introduced. The publisher attempted to save the book by trying to find an influential politician who would support the book. A former journalist in “Życie Warszawy”, Wiesław Górnicki who knew me personally, then a personal advisor to gen. W. Jaruzelski, took the bait. He devoted three weeks of his summer vacation to write a 30 page (one sixth of my book) review only to come up with the conclusion that my book should not be published. I wrote an equally long response, showing his lies and errors, and arguing that the only honorable exit for communists is to give up power, which they finally did only a few years later.

In the meantime, I landed in Chicago, and published my book here, together with Górnicki’s review and my response to it.

An engineer’s mind
I have a master’s degree in electronic engineering with a specialization in mathematical machines. Abstract mathematics and control theory (of complex technological processes) strongly influenced my understanding of social phenomena. My thesis project was about identification of complex technological processes, but I added a chapter about identifying complex social processes as well. This was a result of my interest in political science. Besides my engineering education, I took two years of university level classes in philosophy, sociology, economy and political science. I was one of the most active members of the student’s political science club at the Technical University of Gdańsk (Politechnika Gdańska).

In the trenches
At the beginning of my writing career I met many older colleagues who, after several years of writing, had felt themselves drained of new ideas. Being aware of this, I cherish the inspirational aspect of my professional career. Political circumstances in Poland cooperated to the extent that I was able to publish as a freelancer but, due to my political standing, I could not to get a steady job as a political writer. Under martial law, I was forced to open my own business, because I could not to get a job at all.

In Chicago, I went through the hard times typical of many immigrants. Having difficulties finding decent employment, I started my own company, which I sold profitably ten years later. I enjoyed being an entrepreneur. Being in the service business I got exposure to the bottomless richness of experience. I had many clients among the affluent and as many among the poorest. I had been in the residences of top GM executives and in the headquarters of the El Rukns. I had seen and experienced America not known to most of politicians and business people.

I have a professional understanding of current telecommunication systems. As a consultant, I gradually evolved from engineering to business consulting.

Cicero
For many years I put my writing aside, publishing only a few texts. In December 2000, “Gazeta Wyborcza”, the largest Polish newspaper, published my text about the town of Cicero, IL. While working on this text, I managed to have a two-hour face-to-face conversation with the town President, Betty Loren-Maltese; later sentenced to eight 8 years in prison. At that time she did not talk to media, turning down, among others, CBS 60 Minutes.

Seeking inspiration I went as far as reading hundreds of pages of writings by Marcus Tullius Cicero. None of the authors of more than a hundred of articles about the town of Cicero, published within the last several years in the English language press anywhere between Los Angeles and London, had gone that far.

Historical perspective
For Americans, future is always more important than the past. One of the most famous saying of my mentor, Stefan Bratkowski is that “future has great past”. In their political thinking, American intellectuals are disengaged not only from the history of other nations that most of them simply do not know, but also from the history of America itself. For Bush, the word “crusade” it was a figure of speech. For a large part of the world it is a vivid part of history, emotionally embedded in people’s minds as if it had happened eight days, not eight centuries ago. I see many immigrants who in order to Americanize drop the traditions of their country of origin. The baby is thrown out with the bath water, and in the course of this process America is a country with no history. Two hundred thirty some years, not very rooted in public consciousness, does not count.

I noted that many political commentators in America, looking for historical perspective, reach as far back as the sixties or fifties, the times that they remember. As about five thousand years old history of humankind has not existed.

Could it be worse in America?
Most likely it will. For those of us who’ve experienced a tougher life, America is really “the beautiful”. It is hard to imagine it being better, but it could easily get worse. When I was growing up in Poland we were asking ourselves how many years America was ahead of Europe. I liked the answer Stefan Bratkowski gave, for about two hundred years America has been on the side track. At its inceptions, the U.S.A. took its own path, proven to be successful, and followed by others. After reaching its enormous wealth and power America seems confused in defining its place in the world; which in the meantime changed as well. Let us take the Afghanistan experience as an example. It is telling when the richest and most powerful nation on Earth arrives with the conclusion that in order to protect its security it needs to go into a war against one of the poorest and weakest nations. It is telling even more that Americans did not foresee that it was the war they never could win.

At the beginning of the twenty first century, America has more questions than answers. The track Americans chose when the Republic was born soon became the main route of civilization development. Stalemate, is now the best word describing Americans ability to resolve their problems within the last few decades. The world will not wait. Twenty years from now China’s economy will be the largest in the world. One may ask how many years it will take before the economical and cultural center of the world will float from New York to Shanghai.

About me

I was born in 1951 in Gdansk, Poland.
Since my high school years, I have interest in politics and love for writing. During my college years, I started writing to student papers and soon became freelance author to major Polish political magazines.

In 1980 I wrote a book “Czy w Polsce może być lepiej?” (“Could it be better in Poland?” – this book is available only in Polish) analyzing major problems in Poland at the time and outlining possible solutions.

I was among those Polish political writers who by their writings contributed to the peaceful system transformation that finally took place in 1989. Since 1985, I live in the Chicago area. I went through the hard times typical of many immigrants. Working in service business, I have seen the best and the worst places, I met the poorest and the richest. I have seen and experienced America not known to most of politicians, business people, and other political writers. For eleven years, I ran my own company. Presently, I am an independent consultant.

My political writing comes out of necessity. I write when I see that the prevailing voices on the political arena are misleading or erroneous. Abstract mathematics and control theory (of complex technological processes) strongly influenced my understanding of social phenomena. In the past, my opponents rebuked my mathematical mind as cold, soulless, and inhuman. On a few occasions I was prized for my engineer’s precision and logic.

I have a master’s degree in electronic engineering with a specialization in mathematical machines from Politechnika Gdańska (Technical University of Gdansk).

... more